“Democrats can’t
find a Smocking Gun
tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No
Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO
COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it
a campaign contribution,...
Veteran newsman/traveler/writer Dan Newland comments from a maverick's viewpoint on global affairs, people and places, and on political and social issues affecting North America, South America and the world.
Monday, December 10, 2018
Friday, December 7, 2018
THE DANGER OF GOING WITH GUT OVER SCIENCE
Donald Trump all too often leaves reasonable people with their mouths
hanging open. So much of what he does and says seems, to the logical mind,
utterly incredible and audaciously inappropriate. How, for instance, can a
president of the United States repeatedly declare himself opposed to and in
conflict with his own intelligence community, his own party, his own attorney
general, his own cabinet? These are all firsts on the US political scene that
have many people shaking their heads in disbelief.
A trick-photo joke is too close to true to be funny, when it
comes to Trump's environmental policy. |
But it’s not all that hard to understand Donald Trump’s stance. He is
not the president of all Americans, despite currently occupying the post of President
of the United States. Trump is the president of “Trump”, chief executive of his
own brand. Narcissist that he would appear to be, that brand, that trademark,
that name, is all that he is loyal to. Everything else is expendable—friends,
contacts, allies, his cabinet, members of the media, the general welfare of
Americans and America, even the future of the planet as a whole. In Trump’s
world, nothing is true unless it fits
the Trump narrative.
We witnessed another patent example of this phenomenon this past week
when Trump rejected out of hand a US government report that spoke in no
uncertain terms about the dire threat posed by global climate change and
underscored the need to act now to try to keep it from growing any worse. The congressionally
mandated government report, known as the National
Climate Assessment, predicts that climate change will cost the US economy
400 billion dollars, in current terms, by the end of the century. The report
says that increasingly frequent wildfires that, to date, there is no effective
way of controlling or combating, are already seriously affecting air quality
in the Western states, and with air growing ever hotter and drier, the problem
only stands to become wider-spread in the future.
The report says that "climate
change is transforming where and how we live and presents growing challenges to
human health and quality of life, the economy, and the natural systems that
support us."
According to the report, this includes worsening air pollution causing
heart and lung problems, an increasing variety of diseases transmitted by insects,
and potential for increasing fatalities as a result of heat waves and increasingly
severe allergies. It also indicates that, on our current course, the kind of
ever more extreme weather events that we are experiencing can only get worse.
The report is periodic and mandated by law. It is based on hundreds of
previous research studies and is carried out by over a dozen government
agencies and scores of independent climate, economic and health professionals.
It is a highly comprehensive study that details how global warming from the
burning of coal, oil and gas is hurting each region of US, and how it
impacts different sectors of the economy, including energy and agriculture.
The report wasn’t supposed to be released until this month, but the
Trump administration quietly leaked in on Black Friday (the day after
Thanksgiving, when Americans flock to shopping centers and go on line en masse
to take advantage of post-Thanksgiving deep discounts). According to a quote
from an international policy expert at the World Resources Center, the earlier
release on a date when the general public would be distracted was actually an
attempt by the administration to bury the study.
Following publication of the assessment, Trump said that he has seen it,
“read some of it” and “didn’t believe” that climate change would bring any
serious economic impact.
Just as, in the past, Trump has claimed that he “knows more than the
generals” when it comes to US strategic military interests, in this case, he
appears to know more than the climate scientists, government economists and
specialized federal agencies as well.
The president has several times indicated publicly that he trusts “his
gut” over science. For the sake of his grandchildren and other future
generations, he’d better hope that he’s not mistaking (greenhouse) gas for brain waves emanating from his
gut.
Wednesday, December 5, 2018
ANOTHER TRUMP (AMERICA) FIRST
At the G20 summit held this year in Buenos Aires, Argentina, US
President Donald Trump racked up yet another first. He was the only major world
leader to indicate that he didn’t believe in climate change and would do nothing
to combat it.
That’s right. When the Group of 20 signed a joint statement closing the
summit last Sunday, a major issue was a renewed commitment to actively combatting
global climate change in accordance with the Paris Accord, but final approval
was not unanimous. Only 19 of the 20 major economies committed once more to
fighting climate change. The only hold-out...You guessed it.
The US also flatly objected to use of the word “protectionism” in the
final draft of the agreement in the section covering flaws in the current world
trading system. Resistance from Washington was so great that the word ended up
being censored from the final text.
But this was also consistent with the Trump administration’s policies,
since if the international trade system has gone from being flawed to heading
for a complete breakdown, the shift can only be attributed to the US president,
who has levied tariffs on friends and rivals alike, sparking a major trade war
with China that has thrown the international economy into a tizzy and prompted
worldwide confusion and trade insecurity.
Protectionism is precisely what Trump is attempting to engage in (though
he refuses to call it that). But he has failed to realize that the global
economy is now so interconnected that it is impossible to impose protectionist
tariffs against another major world trading power like China, or such a close
trading partner as Canada, without shooting yourself in the proverbial foot.
The best example? The closure of five General Motors plants in the US because
tariffs imposed on imported parts have made it cheaper for the auto giant to
produce cars elsewhere.
Delegates from other countries attending the G20 meeting would later
reveal that negotiations had been grueling and that the US had been the lone
hold-out on nearly every issue included (and not included) in the final agreement.
The Trump administration has been openly critical of the World Trade Organization,
which is at odds with Trump’s America First (America Alone) policy that has his
administration implementing unprecedentedly aggressive trade policies targeting
not only China but also US allies in European Union and elsewhere.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)