My friend John was the first person who ever talked to me about Erich Priebke.
An American World War II vet, he surprised me by saying he didn’t know what all
the fuss was about.
 |
| SS Captain Erich Priebke |
This was back in the mid-‘90s when I’d first moved down to Bariloche in
Patagonia, and I was just starting to find out about Priebke from the news
reports about Italy’s attempts to extradite him for his role in the massacre that
the Nazis had carried out in the Ardeatine Caves in Rome during World War II.
“Well,” I said, “you know, John, he’s a war criminal, a former SS
leader, and, if the Italians are right, a mass murderer...”
John chuckled sardonically under his breath—something I’d learned he did
when he didn’t believe a word you were saying. He reeled to his feet (we were
sitting at his dining room table) and made his way to the kitchen where he kept
his gin stashed out of sight of his wife, in a cubbyhole between a cupboard and
the woodstove. His wife and mine were out on a walk along the lake and wouldn’t
be back for a while so he wasn’t being as shy as usual about his gin. (Cheap white
wine was what he favored throughout the day as his ostensible “sole drink of
choice,” but the gin was what he used to keep his buzz going from morning to
night). He deftly snatched the liter bottle of Gordon’s from its hiding place,
poured a water glass half-full and, standing right there by the stove, he drank
it down thirstily like water.
“Want another beer?” he asked, clearing his throat, his diction, as
always, incredibly unslurred.
“No, I’m good for now,” I said, holding up my half-full can.
“Suit yourself,” he shrugged, adding, “Just grab one out of the fridge
when you need it,” and then he meandered back to the table, sat down and poured
his water tumbler full of chilled wine from a pitcher that sat on the table
between us. The wine he sipped as he thought about where to go next with the
conversation. That was the way conversations went with John—no rush, nice and
easy. Originally from New Jersey, he hadn’t been in a hurry since 1968, when he’d
negotiated a golden handshake from his executive post in Buenos Aires with the Eli
Lilly pharmaceuticals firm and moved to the 200 acres of mountainside he’d bought
here in Patagonia with a business partner. Back then, they’d bought it for a
song from the widow of the former owner, because it was out in the wilderness
where nobody wanted to live. He still owned 25 acres of it despite having lived
ever since on the profits he’d made from selling off his half a couple of acres
at a time, once there was electricity and a better road to get here, and the
area started becoming attractive to people with a little money who wanted to
get away from it all.
After a moment he chuckled quietly again, but his piercing blue,
bloodshot eyes remained serious, unwavering. “Erich’s no murderer. He’s one of
the nicest, most respectable guys you’d ever want to meet. I remember him from
when he had his deli and butcher shop in town. Everybody liked him. And he’s
been a pillar of the community, head of the German school and all that.”
“Just your everyday, good-guy storm trooper, huh?” I goaded.
“Oh hell, Dan,” he said, “he’s no more a storm trooper than I am.”
“Not strictly true, John,” I said.
“And he wasn’t any kind of Nazi leader like they’re trying to make him
out to be,” he went on, ignoring and immediately forgiving my sarcasm. “He was
a pipsqueak captain, an administrative one at that. He was a nobody. Whatever
he did, he was just doing what he was told to do.”
“That argument hasn’t flown since the Nuremberg Trials,” I said. “And it
doesn’t fly in the American Army either. I was a soldier like you. I know that
you’re only obliged to follow all lawful
orders. Somebody tells me to shoot a hog-tied civilian in the back of the head,
that’s not an order, it’s a moral choice and I have to make it. I can opt to
refuse.”
Again, the low, bitter chuckle, almost under his breath. “That’s pretty
naïve of you, Dan. I mean for a former big-city newsman, at least. One thing’s
the theory in the rule book. Another’s being at war.” His voice quavered when
he said, “I did some things I’m not very proud of when I was following Patton’s
ass through Europe, and I imagine your dad did too.”
“He never talks about it,” I said.
“With good reason, I’m sure,” he responded.
“So you were with Patton?”
“Sort of...like I say, behind him, kind of.”
“I guess everybody was sort of behind Patton,” I said. “To hear my dad
tell it, Patton breezed through Europe with a convoy of tanks and then bragged
about winning the war.”
This time John’s laugh was genuine. “Well, I never saw him out there
directing traffic like they had George Scott doing in the movie, at least,” he
snorted. He drained his glass and filled it with wine again. He sat there
sipping his drink in silence, but I could almost hear him thinking. On his
battered old Zenith stereo, Satchmo was singing “Jelly Roll”. There was always
jazz on the stereo at John’s house. He’d shuffle back and forth for hours on
end between his two loves, white wine and old-time jazz music. Sitting there at
the table, the music coming from behind him, in the living room, he cupped his
right ear, grinned and said, “I love this tune,” and then, in his scratchy,
froggy, tenor voice, he softly sang along for a few bars: “My momma said
today...when she went away...you be a goo’ boy, I bring you a toy...’cause I’m
Momma’s pride an’ joy...”
Then his face went serious again and he looked me hard in the eyes.
“There was this time, somewhere on the Rhine, I think. We’d been
fighting for days. We were exhausted. But by now we were winning. It was toward
the end...sometimes house to house. It was ugly. We’d lost some guys. There
were guys in our outfit that wanted to burn Germany to the ground. Anyway, one
day we took this factory. When we overcame the security, we had our interpreter
order everybody in German to come out with their hands up. They didn’t try to
run or put up a fight. They came out single file, their hands in the air. All
of the sudden this sergeant of ours points his forty-five at this kid at the
front—because that’s what he was, just a kid—and shoots him pointblank in the
head, right here.” John put his index finger to his left temple. “I was looking
right at the kid’s face when he died. It was, like, surprised, his eyes, his
expression when his brains flew out the other side of his head, and then he was
dead.” John was seeing it, right now, I knew, as if he were there. Tears welled
up in his eyes and one spilled over and ran down his cheek. He didn’t bother to
wipe it away, maybe didn’t even notice it. It dripped from his chin. He went
on: “I yelled, ‘What the hell are you doing? They’re giving up! What the hell’s
wrong with you?’ But he just laughed
and said, ‘These dumb-assed krauts deserve to die...’”
John rubbed his eyes, shook his head, as if trying to shake the image of
that day, perhaps of what followed as well. “Even now,” he said, “I see that
boy’s face, and so many other boys’ faces, every night before I fall asleep.”
Now he looked at me intensely. “And I’m sure Erich sees the people he killed
too, Dan...and the ones he didn’t. He’s a good man. I know him well. War’s
hell, Dan. That’s not a metaphor. It’s a fact. You think a mere captain had any
real choice in the Nazi army? He had to take part in that massacre or be killed
himself for refusing a direct order from Hitler.”
“He had a moral choice, though, John,” I insisted. “He could have chosen
death over such a heinous crime.”
John chuckled low and insincerely. “Nobody chooses death in war, Dan.
Your only thought is surviving till the end.”
* * *
On the mountain road that leads to my house, 20 clicks from Bariloche,
where Erich Priebke not only lived under his own name for half a century
following World War II but was also a well-known and highly respected businessman
and community leader, there’s a sheet metal plate bearing his name on the post
of an electrical transformer. There are actually two transformers on that road.
The other one bears the name of another pioneer neighbor and architect, Raúl
Bozzarelli. It was the practice of the local electrical cooperative, way back
when, to identify the transformers for new areas of service by the surname of
the first settler to request it, mainly because in order to have electricity,
whoever arrived first had to pay for the installation of the transformer. Accordingly,
if the lines are down and you call in for a maintenance crew to be sent out, even
today, what the co-op will want to know is if your sector is Bozzarelli or
Priebke.
 |
Even today, what the electrical co-op will want to know
is if your sector is Bozzarelli or Priebke.
|
Although Priebke had a home in town from the late 1940s on, at some
point he had also bought about 15 acres of mountainous woodland fronting on the
beautiful, glacial Lake Moreno and built himself a fine country home there.
After Priebke’s extradition in the ‘90s to Italy for trial on charges of crimes
against humanity, a neighbor or two tried to stir up a movement to get
Priebke’s name removed from “our” transformer. But in the end, there was no
real interest: Besides us, who’d see it, out here in the middle of nowhere? And
even if they did, who’d care? Furthermore, the name on that transformer was the
surname only and Erich Priebke’s family were still the owners of that land. A
moot protest, then. So the sign still says “Priebke” on it, a reminder of the
past when Don Erich was thought of as
a respected neighbor, not a murderer, and when his family were well known and
well liked members of the community, not descendants of a Hitlerian monster.
That piece of land, where the Priebkes’ country home is, shares a
property line with 70 acres of forest for which I’m the caretaker. So I used to
run into Priebke’s granddaughter walking her dogs on the high road, or driving
her little VW Saveiro pickup into town for supplies when she lived there for a
time before moving, I’m told, to the United States. Sometimes too, one of his
two sons and I would wave hello to each other when he’d come out for a visit to
the place. But since Erich Priebke’s conviction in Italy, the only one I see
from time to time, caretaker to caretaker, is Don Pedro, the Priebkes’ foreman, who still lives on the spread and
is in charge of protecting it for the family.
“The señor hasn’t been out here
for several years now,” he said, his voice and face forlorn, when I met up with
him while we were both on our rounds one day earlier this year.
“Well, he’s under arrest in Italy, after all, and he’s nearly a hundred
years old!” I said.
“No, no,” said Pedro, “I mean his son and his family, the one who still
lives here. It’s very sad.
It has all been very terrible for the family.”
So now it’s mostly just Don
Pedro...and the Rottweilers that help him keep the poachers away—a case of the
past catching up to the present and completely changing the perception of
reality.
* * *
Journalist, writer and former National Parks Ranger Abel Basti has been
researching the lives of former Nazis in Argentina—and particularly in
Bariloche—for the past 20 years now. His research for Hitler in Argentina and the book itself have gained him a
reputation as a crackpot among detractors and as a knowledgeable authority
among those who have long believed, like him, in cloak and dagger collusion and
trade-offs between the post-war US intelligence community and the former Reich
that permitted some top Nazis, including—if Basti is to be believed—the Führer
himself, to slip through the cracks and live out their days in southern
Argentina and Chile.
Basti was sitting in Priebke’s living room interviewing him the day
Argentine Federal Police officers arrived at the door carrying a Interpol order
with them for the arrest of the then-octogenarian former SS captain. What would ensue was a very
long process of extradition demands from Italy and Germany and appeals by
Priebke’s attorneys that had the effect of delaying the inevitable for long
months. But eventually, all of these tactics failed and the Argentine
government, then under President Carlos Saúl Menem, eventually cleared the way
for Priebke’s extradition and trial.
Shortly after Priebke’s extradition, going about his duties as a local
reporter and correspondent, Basti would be surprised one morning to see a tour
bus full of foreign visitors stopped in front of Erich Priebke’s home and hear
the tour guide telling the travelers that this was the home of the infamous
Nazi leader, Erich Priebke. Basti found this hilarious and immediately started
toying with the idea of a satirical work, a sort of travel guide to Nazi points
of interest in South America’s best known ski resort—and one of its best known
havens for ex-Nazi exiles.
Joking about it with me when we met on the street in town one morning,
he asked, half in jest, what I thought of a “Nazi Bariloche” travel guide.
Without batting an eye, I said I thought it would sell like hotcakes. A few
weeks later, Basti called to say he’d written it and asked if I’d read it, and,
if I liked it, write the back cover. The book, with my comments on the back
cover, is now in its seventh printing, according to Amazon.
The controversial cover bears an image of the famed Bariloche Civic
Center but instead of the equestrian statue of General Julio A. Roca—revered by
nationalists as the founder of modern Argentina and reviled by liberals and left-wingers
as the author of a veritable genocide waged against the native population—an
image of Hitler, in full uniform, right arm raised in a Nazi salute and
standing on a pedestal has been photoshopped in.
Shortly after it first came out, a close friend of mine in the tiny
local Jewish community told me that Bariloche Jews were furious about it. Why,
I wanted to know? Shouldn’t they delight to anything that brought the Nazis to
light and smoked them out of their hiding places?
That wasn’t how they viewed it, he told me. Things like this just
stirred up the whole thing again and bred enmity. For instance, one of the
places that Basti had marked as a Nazi site in his book was precisely where a
Jewish couple had rented space for their business. Bariloche was a quiet town.
Nobody wanted any trouble.
But Basti’s main business was (and is) finding old Nazis—in recent years
his works and documentaries have been published in Germany and elsewhere in
Europe, though the United States continues to ignore his claims—and in a town
that was a frontier outpost less than half a century old when the war ended and
did much of its developing with a post-war wave of immigration, when popular
dictator Juan Domingo Perón, a military man of well-known Fascist sympathies,
opened the country’s doors to fugitive former members of the Reich—Bariloche is
a treasure trove for such an investigator. Basti’s book, Bariloche Nazi, documents his claims with maps, photos, papers and
drawings, so that, although it started out as a joke, it eventually became a
serious work that some foreign tourists arrive carrying in their knapsacks or
under their arms. But the book’s crown jewel is almost as inaccessible now as
then: Incalco Ranch located on Lake Nahuel Huapi, on the opposite shore from
Bariloche, the place where Basti claims Adolph Hitler and Eva Braun lived an
idyllic existence after the war. It is an exclusive residence that, back then,
was accessible only by boat or hydroplane, and it belonged to none other than
Argentine businessman Jorge Antonio, one of Perón’s most trusted friends.
* * *
Born in Berlin in 1913, Erich Priebke died earlier this month (October
11), at the age of one hundred. He had been under house arrest (because of his
extremely advanced age) in Rome since his conviction in 1996 for his part in
the Ardeatine Caves Massacre.
 |
| Priebke naïvely thought he could tell his story. |
The facts are historically simple if morally complex. Priebke was a 31-year-old captain in the SS
police force, stationed in Rome under the orders of German Commander Herbert
Kappler. It was in the latter part of the war, in March of 1944, that Italian
Resistance fighters attached to the Gruppi di Azione Partigiana (GAP) attacked
a column of SS Military Police troops marching along Rome’s Via Rasella,
killing 33 German soldiers by first setting off a bomb near the detachment and
then attacking the group with small arms fire and hand grenades.
Although never documented, Commander Kappler is alleged to have received
direct orders from the Führer himself to execute ten imprisoned Italian
anti-Nazis for every soldier to die as a result of the attack. It was Kappler
who compiled the list of 330 people whom the Reich condemned to die in the
Ardeatine Caves.
Major Karl Haas (who was an SS Intelligence officer with a well-established reputation for ruthlessness that included sending hundreds of Jews from the region to Auschwitz) and Captain Priebke were placed in charge of rounding the prisoners up. Priebke was specifically charged with checking the list. And although the Italian courts that tried him, in principle, tended to agree that he had been a staff-grade officer following orders, his responsibility for the list and his own participation were what eventually condemned him. During the trial it was established that while the order was to kill ten Italian Partisans for each of the 33 German soldiers killed in the Resistance raid, the number of people killed in the Ardeatine Caves was 335, not 330—with five people not on Kappler’s list having been added by mistake. Furthermore, Priebke admitted to having executed two of the prisoners himself, as did Haas.
 |
| Entrance to the Ardeatine Caves in Rome Photo originally
posted at http://www.flickr.com/photos/antmoose/66450192/ |
Both Priebke and Haas were captured by the Allies following the war.
Interestingly enough, however, while Priebke was held in a British prison camp
to be bound over for a war crimes trial for his part in the Ardeatine slayings,
Haas went from being a POW to allegedly going to work for US intelligence as a
spy against the Soviet Union. Priebke ultimately escaped from the prison camp
and, after some time in hiding, in South Tyrol, eventually received help from
Bishop Alois Hudal at the Vatican, who reportedly aided him in obtaining false
documentation and finding a new home in Argentina. There he would live under
his own name for half a century until the team of TV reporter Sam Donaldson of
the ABC network in the United States stumbled onto a less than successful clearance
table book in which Priebke was described as one of the architects of the
Ardeatine Massacre and decided to follow up on the lead, which took them to Bariloche.
Largely unrepentant and always believing that he had only acted on
orders and that the people executed at the Ardeatine Caves were, at the time,
“terrorists”, Priebke naïvely felt that enough time had passed that he could
talk about the incident and gave Donaldson an interview. Once aired on US television,
the interview sparked outrage in Italy and the backlash led to Priebke’s arrest
and extradition. Curiously enough, former Major Haas was called as a mere
witness for Priebke’s trial. But as a result of his testimony, he eventually
also ended up being charged and tried, and died under house arrest in a rest
home near Rome at age 92.
* * *
There can be little doubt that Erich Priebke, not a boy but a mature man
of 31 at the time of the war, was a thoroughly committed SS officer and he played
a key role in the organization of one of the most heinous Nazi war crimes of
World War II. Nor can there be any doubt that, in trying him for his part in
the Ardeatine Caves Massacre, Italy was doing long-delayed justice for a
terrible atrocity.
But where justice would appear to have turned to vengeance was when
Priebke died this month. The Vatican (perhaps as damage control for the role of
one of its own number in Priebke’s escape and exile) reportedly issued an
unprecedented ban on his funeral’s being held anywhere in Rome. Priebke’s own
native city also refused his body, fearing his tomb might become a pilgrimage
site for neo-Nazis. In the end, his funeral was eventually arranged—not without
violent protests—by a Catholic splinter, the Society of Saint Pius X—a group
alleged to have Fascist and anti-Semitic sympathies. Their plan was to inter the former Nazi in the Italian city of
Albano Laziale. Since protesters kept the body from being buried there, it was eventually decided that Priebke's remains would be laid to rest in an undisclosed location.
But the cruelest cut of all, I feel, was Argentina’s refusal to
repatriate Erich Priebke’s body. His last wish had been to be laid to rest next
to his wife in the country that he had called home for half a century after the
war. Despite the fact that the founder of the current ruling party, General
Juan Domingo Perón, was clearly the key to the immigration of fleeing former
Nazis in the post-war years, and although the Peronist government of Carlos
Menem that preceded the current Peronist-led administration upheld the concept
of “due obedience” that kept members of Argentina’s former military regime from
being tried for human rights violations and murder until the current Peronist
administration overturned that amnesty, the administration of Cristina Kirchner
felt perfectly justified in turning down the Priebke family’s request that they
be permitted to bring his remains home. Considering that congressional
elections (where ruling FPV candidates aren’t expected to do well) are to be
held in this country next Sunday, and that the current administration has
blatantly used its early human rights stand to cover up abuses of power of every
color ever since, not accepting the return of Priebke’s body seemed
hypocritical at best and like political grandstanding at worst. What part could
his family possibly have had, I asked myself, in the cruel and misguided
decisions and choices that a young army officer made nearly 70 years ago?
Didn’t the sentence against Priebke end with his death and shouldn’t his family
have the right to mourn and bury him?
I was immediately reminded of Gabriel García Márquez’s novel, Hojarasca (Leaf Storm), in which a
fallen physician’s perceived sins against the town where he once practiced lead
him to live the life of a recluse, locked away in his home, and to eventually commit
suicide. But even then, the townspeople refuse to forget his misdeeds, and ban
anyone from burying him. So great is their hatred that they say there will be
no burial for the man “until they can smell his corpse rotting in his house
from the other side of the street.”
In the story that García Márquez tells, the moral conundrum has to do,
precisely, with when “enough is enough”, when blind justice turns to blind
vengeance, and when the actions of a “just” society turn nearly as hateful as
the sentiments behind the crimes they condemn.
To my mind those are questions that emerged this month too from the
refusal of the countries of his birth and choice to afford Erich Priebke a
proper Christian burial in the presence of his family, no matter what crimes he
was convicted of and sentenced for in life. And perhaps another question that
this begs is how much more we know of compassion in dealing with his family and
his death than Priebke himself did in making at least one major decision of his
life.
