As we today mark precisely six month's since the Hamas terrorist organization's brutally violent attack on Israeli citizens, it is no longer possible for anyone with even a glimmer of humanitarian moral conscience to condone Israel’s disproportionate response to that heinous attack suffered last October 7, in which twelve hundred Israeli citizens tragically lost their lives. Here’s a piece of data to back this pronouncement: In the ensuing months, Israeli bombs and artillery have slaughtered more innocent Palestinian children in the Gaza Strip than have been killed in all other worldwide conflicts combined over the past four years recorded.
I should be clear here
that, when I refer to Israel, I am not talking about Israelis as a whole, but
rather, about the extreme right-wing government of Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi”
Netanyahu. Indeed, for a combination of reasons that range from the strictly
humanitarian to the purely political—such as the sagacious argument that
Netanyahu’s brutal policies are creating
more terrorists than they are destroying—the prime minister and his
administration are facing ever-increasing and expanding internal protests and
unrest.
Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu |
And it is clear too that he
represents only a scant minority of his people, since latest polls show his
popularity crashing and burning at well under twenty percent of the population.
In other words, it’s not difficult to surmise that it is in Netanyahu’s selfish
political interests to ensure that he can make his personal war on the
Palestinian people (make no mistake, Hamas is a mere excuse for the genocidal policies
the prime minister is employing against an entire people) last as long as he
can possibly stretch it. Or better said, as long as the United States will not
only put up with this outrage, but also keep shipping him all the fire-power he
needs to wipe the Gaza Strip off the map, and a large segment of its general
population with it. Hence, his staunch resistance to any sort of ceasefire or
negotiation—especially any negotiation that includes the slightest hint of an
eventual two-state solution, which, as diplomats and foreign policy experts all
over the world agree, is the only sort of solution that will ever permit peace
in that area of the Near/Middle East. In simple terms, when and if the war
ends, Netanyahu’s time as head of the Israeli government will very like end
with it.
For anyone who might feel
that the title of this essay is a bit over the top, people a great deal more in
touch with the issue than I am are also calling the brutal and indiscriminate
attacks on the Gaza Strip “a war against children.”
To this point, Commissioner-General Philippe Lazzarini of the United Nations Relief Work Agency has said, “This war is a war on children. It is a war on their childhood and their future.” Lazzarini used the term “staggering” to describe the cold hard facts. He said that latest Gaza health authority reports indicate that at least 12,300 youngsters have died in the Israeli attacks on the Gaza enclave in the months since Netanyahu’s war began. He compared that figure with the 12,193 children killed in all other worldwide conflicts combined in the four years between 2019 and 2022 (the last years for which final data is available). Seen in this light, it seems ludicrous to keep referring to the mass slaughter of civilians in Gaza as “collateral damage.”
News agency reports indicate that, just in the first hundred days of the war, Israeli forces dropped at least 30,000 bombs (nearly all supplied by the United States as “defensive” weaponry) in its air raids on infrastructure and on the homes of Gazan citizens. According to Lebanese-born Mohamad Safa, a diplomat and UN-accredited human rights activist, the total of bombs that Israel had dropped on the Gaza Strip in those first one hundred days was equivalent to eight times the number that the United States released over Iraq in six years of war. Some observers say that in terms of use of firepower and destruction per square kilometer, there has been no heavier bombing anywhere since the US carpet-bombing of North Vietnam in 1972 (Operation Linebacker II).
Reporting in The American Prospect, a respected
online liberal bimonthly publication that specializes in discussions on public
policy, editorialist Harold Meyerson recalled that, in public remarks about
Israel’s war in Gaza, US President Joe Biden
had urged Israel not to make the same mistakes America made in responding to
the attacks of 9/11: overreacting, which, in the case of the United States,
consisted of taking the war to a country (Iraq) that wasn’t even involved in
the attacks, and to another country (Afghanistan) where Americans remained
enmeshed for 20 years. But Meyerson points out that, if anything, “Israel has
opted to ape an even greater American folly. It is waging war on Gaza much as
we waged war on Vietnam.”
Another patent sign of
Netanyahu’s intentionality in crushing not just Hamas, but the Palestinian
people as a whole, is his utilization of famine as a weapon of war, as is the
intentional bombing of housing, hospitals and other vital infrastructure. While
the US has soft-pedalled in its “requests”, rather than demands backed by action (for
instance, the suspension of military aid until said requests are fulfilled) to
ensure that food, water, medical supplies and other humanitarian assistance are
getting to the civilian population in Gaza, Netanyahu has pursued a cruel and
internationally illegal policy of purposely withholding even the most basic of
assistance, adding this to the destruction of an estimated seventy percent of
all Gazan housing and infrastructure, as a means of bringing the entire
Palestinian population to its knees.
Even the much-touted
reopening of the Erez border crossing between Gaza and Israel—closed since the
Hamas attacks on Israel last October—following a reportedly tense phone call
between Netanyahu and US President Biden, appears to be little more than a
publicity stunt, since news correspondents on the ground, who were forced to
leave the immediate area by IDF personnel, reported hearing continued shelling
and gunfire on the Gaza side of the crossing. They also reported that the road
on the Gaza side had been heavily shelled and was full of bomb craters, as well
as having been mined near the border, which didn’t bode well for the chances of
semi-trucks and trailers carrying food and medical supplies being able to
actually cross into Gazan territory, particularly not in any great numbers.
Aid workers' truck targeted by Israel |
UNRWA
Commissioner-General Lazzarini recently reported a targeted attack on one of
his group’s facilities. In that attack on a UNRWA food distribution center in
Rafah, at the southern edge of the Gaza Strip, one of the UN group’s staffers
was killed and twenty-two others were injured. Said Lazzarini, “Today’s attack
on one of the very few remaining UNRWA distribution centers in the Gaza Strip
comes as food supplies are running out, hunger is widespread and, in some
areas, turning into famine.”
He was clear about the
intentionality of that attack as well: “Every day, we share the coordinates of
all our facilities across the Gaza Strip with parties to the conflict. The
Israeli army received the coordinates including of this facility…”
Since Netanyahu initiated
his war of attrition on the Palestinian people half a year ago,
the UNRWA has
recorded an unprecedented number of violations against its staff and
facilities. At least one hundred sixty-five UNRWA team members have been killed,
including while in the line of duty. More than one hundred fifty of the
agency’s facilities have been hit, many schools among them. And there are
reports of at least another thirty-five combat-related deaths among aid workers
from other organizations making an effort to help Palestinian civilians.
These are all tactics
that have been vigorously condemned when employed by regimes considered to be
enemies of the West. The best example is that of Syria, where the cruel regime
of Bashar Al Assad, with the enthusiastic backing of the even crueler regime of
Russian President Vladimir Putin, has employed exactly the same methods to end opposition to his authoritarian
rule, and, in the process, slaughtered at least a quarter-million Syrian
civilians. But so far, the US has led the West in giving Netanyahu a mildly
reluctant pass in this sense, far too long supporting Israel’s claims of mere
defensive action with a certain amount of “collateral damage.” In point of
fact, civilian deaths due to “collateral damage” have already topped fatal
enemy combatant casualties by a rate of six to one. And that doesn’t begin to
take into account the number of Palestinians who face death daily due to
induced dehydration, starvation and deprivation of medical supplies and
attention.
Before and after - greenhouses and gardens targeted |
UN aid workers reiterate
daily their warnings regarding the catastrophically perilous situation in Gaza.
UN estimates indicate that one in four
Gazan Palestinians are living in a state of near-famine. This comes to a total
of at least 576,000 people. Already, twenty-five people have died of acute
malnutrition. Again, children are the most vulnerable, and twenty-one of those
deaths were child fatalities. UNICEF
estimates that 1.7 million Gazan—out of a total of 2.2 million total—have been
uprooted from their homes. Of those displaced, a million are children, and some
seventeen thousand of those are kids who are either separated from their
parents or who have evacuated war zones unaccompanied. This renders them even
more vulnerable, since children are among the people least able to cope with
hunger, disease and general neglect.
The international
watchdog organization Human Rights Watch terms the tactics employed by Israel
under Netanyahu “a war crime.” HRW clearly accuses Israeli forces of “deliberately
blocking the delivery of water, food, and fuel, while willfully impeding
humanitarian assistance, apparently razing agricultural areas, and depriving
the civilian population of objects indispensable to their survival.”
The human rights group
points to public statements from Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant,
National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Energy Minister Israel Katz from
the beginning of the war, indicating that their aim is to deprive Gaza
civilians of food, water and fuel, an apparent policy reflected in the concrete
actions of IDF officers and troops. Some Israeli officials have also indicated
that aid would be withheld as a sort of ransom, until Israeli hostages are
released or until Hamas has been destroyed.
Two days after the brutal Hamas attack on Israel last October, Defense Minister
Gallant said: “We are imposing a complete siege on [Gaza]. No electricity, no
food, no water, no fuel–everything is closed. We are fighting human animals and
we must act accordingly.”
National Security
Minister Ben-Gvir tweeted a week later, “So long as Hamas does not release
the hostages, the only thing that should enter Gaza is hundreds of tons of air
force explosives, not an ounce of humanitarian aid.”
And five days after the
Hamas attack, Energy Minister Katz said:
“Humanitarian aid to
Gaza? Not a switch will be flicked on, not a valve will be opened, not a fuel
truck will enter until the Israeli hostages come home. Humanitarian for
humanitarian. Let no one lecture us about morality.”
In support of its claims
that Israel is not only withholding food but is also destroying Palestinians’
own essential food production capabilities, HRW has provided before-and-after
satellite images showing thriving Gazan fields, orchards and greenhouses
apparently bulldozed by Israeli operatives just days after the Israeli war on
the Gaza strip began. High resolution satellite imagery of farmland near the
Erez border crossing shows both bulldozer tracks and soil bulldozed into mounds
surrounding former agricultural plots.
According to Human Rights
Watch Israel and Palestine Director Omar Shakir: “…Israel has been depriving
Gaza's population of food and water, a policy spurred on or endorsed by
high-ranking Israeli officials and reflecting an intent to starve civilians as
a method of warfare. World leaders should be speaking out against this
abhorrent war crime, which has devastating effects on Gaza’s population.”
And there can be little
doubt that human rights leaders are justified in referring to Netanyahu’s
actions as a war crime. According to international humanitarian law and
internationally accepted rules of war, intentionally starving civilians as a method
of warfare is prohibited. The Rome
Statute, under which the International Criminal Court operates, takes this a
step further by providing that “depriving (civilians in war zones) of objects
indispensable to their survival, including willfully impeding relief supplies”
is a war crime. Nor does criminal intent require the attacker’s admission of
such acts. These can be inferred from the totality of evidence and of the circumstances
involved in any military campaign.
According to human rights
activists and newspaper reports from media ranging from Al Jazeera to The New York
Times, this trend has only worsened over the course of the war, with the
number of Palestinians detained, many innocent bystanders and random men of
military age, having burgeoned to some nine thousand. According the Physicians
for Human Rights report published in ReliefWeb,
“Efforts to push Israeli courts to
intervene and prevent the systematic disregard of reasonable incarceration
standards have so far been unsuccessful. Similarly, efforts to encourage the
medical community to safeguard the right to adequate care have also failed. As
a result, Israel’s vindictive policies and unofficial punitive measures in
prisons continue unchecked and unchallenged.”
Accusations
including holding prisoners for extended periods naked, hooded and shackled in
infra-human conditions, systematic humiliation and beatings, denial of basic
medical care, as well as other forms of torture and sexual assault. Sadly, there
has been nearly no international outcry regarding these blatant rights
violations other than those coming from the world human rights community.
We Americans have always
stood with Israel. We recall the Holocaust and the fact that the Jewish people
have been the most persecuted and victimized social group of modern times. We
remember this as a major rallying call for rising up against fascism and crushing
it in the deadliest war of all time. We recall and hold as nothing short of
sacred the memory of the six million Jews exterminated by Nazi Germany during
World War II, in what was the worst genocide in history. In much the same way,
we remember the twelve hundred Israelis and foreign visitors murdered by Hamas
terrorists last year.
But Benjamin Netanyahu is
taking unfair advantage of the deference that the West has bestowed on Jews in
general and on the State of Israel in particular. Worse still, he is employing,
in a sense, the same sort of indiscriminate and genocidal tactics in his
personal war on the Palestinians that led to the Holocaust during World War II.
While he insists that his only purpose is to wipe out the Hamas terrorist
organization, his mass killing of Palestinian civilians can no longer be
ignored, condoned or excused.
Netanyahu’s war is an
all-out war on the Palestinian people. It is a war that shows no mercy for
civilians in general, or for women and children in particular. And making war
on children is clearly contrary to his stated aim of doing away with Hamas.
Making war on children definitively guarantees a whole new generation of ever
more ruthless, anti-Israeli fighters. As such, this will be the cruel and
dangerous legacy of Netanyahu’s war, bequeathed by him both to the people of
Israel, and to the Palestinian people.