“Democrats can’t
find a Smocking Gun
tying the Trump campaign to Russia after James Comey’s testimony. No Smocking Gun...No
Collusion.” @FoxNews That’s because there was NO
COLLUSION. So now the Dems go to a simple private transaction, wrongly call it
a campaign contribution,...
Veteran newsman/traveler/writer Dan Newland comments from a maverick's viewpoint on global affairs, people and places, and on political and social issues affecting North America, South America and the world.
Monday, December 10, 2018
Friday, December 7, 2018
THE DANGER OF GOING WITH GUT OVER SCIENCE
Donald Trump all too often leaves reasonable people with their mouths
hanging open. So much of what he does and says seems, to the logical mind,
utterly incredible and audaciously inappropriate. How, for instance, can a
president of the United States repeatedly declare himself opposed to and in
conflict with his own intelligence community, his own party, his own attorney
general, his own cabinet? These are all firsts on the US political scene that
have many people shaking their heads in disbelief.
A trick-photo joke is too close to true to be funny, when it
comes to Trump's environmental policy. |
But it’s not all that hard to understand Donald Trump’s stance. He is
not the president of all Americans, despite currently occupying the post of President
of the United States. Trump is the president of “Trump”, chief executive of his
own brand. Narcissist that he would appear to be, that brand, that trademark,
that name, is all that he is loyal to. Everything else is expendable—friends,
contacts, allies, his cabinet, members of the media, the general welfare of
Americans and America, even the future of the planet as a whole. In Trump’s
world, nothing is true unless it fits
the Trump narrative.
We witnessed another patent example of this phenomenon this past week
when Trump rejected out of hand a US government report that spoke in no
uncertain terms about the dire threat posed by global climate change and
underscored the need to act now to try to keep it from growing any worse. The congressionally
mandated government report, known as the National
Climate Assessment, predicts that climate change will cost the US economy
400 billion dollars, in current terms, by the end of the century. The report
says that increasingly frequent wildfires that, to date, there is no effective
way of controlling or combating, are already seriously affecting air quality
in the Western states, and with air growing ever hotter and drier, the problem
only stands to become wider-spread in the future.
The report says that "climate
change is transforming where and how we live and presents growing challenges to
human health and quality of life, the economy, and the natural systems that
support us."
According to the report, this includes worsening air pollution causing
heart and lung problems, an increasing variety of diseases transmitted by insects,
and potential for increasing fatalities as a result of heat waves and increasingly
severe allergies. It also indicates that, on our current course, the kind of
ever more extreme weather events that we are experiencing can only get worse.
The report is periodic and mandated by law. It is based on hundreds of
previous research studies and is carried out by over a dozen government
agencies and scores of independent climate, economic and health professionals.
It is a highly comprehensive study that details how global warming from the
burning of coal, oil and gas is hurting each region of US, and how it
impacts different sectors of the economy, including energy and agriculture.
The report wasn’t supposed to be released until this month, but the
Trump administration quietly leaked in on Black Friday (the day after
Thanksgiving, when Americans flock to shopping centers and go on line en masse
to take advantage of post-Thanksgiving deep discounts). According to a quote
from an international policy expert at the World Resources Center, the earlier
release on a date when the general public would be distracted was actually an
attempt by the administration to bury the study.
Following publication of the assessment, Trump said that he has seen it,
“read some of it” and “didn’t believe” that climate change would bring any
serious economic impact.
Just as, in the past, Trump has claimed that he “knows more than the
generals” when it comes to US strategic military interests, in this case, he
appears to know more than the climate scientists, government economists and
specialized federal agencies as well.
The president has several times indicated publicly that he trusts “his
gut” over science. For the sake of his grandchildren and other future
generations, he’d better hope that he’s not mistaking (greenhouse) gas for brain waves emanating from his
gut.
Wednesday, December 5, 2018
ANOTHER TRUMP (AMERICA) FIRST
At the G20 summit held this year in Buenos Aires, Argentina, US
President Donald Trump racked up yet another first. He was the only major world
leader to indicate that he didn’t believe in climate change and would do nothing
to combat it.
That’s right. When the Group of 20 signed a joint statement closing the
summit last Sunday, a major issue was a renewed commitment to actively combatting
global climate change in accordance with the Paris Accord, but final approval
was not unanimous. Only 19 of the 20 major economies committed once more to
fighting climate change. The only hold-out...You guessed it.
The US also flatly objected to use of the word “protectionism” in the
final draft of the agreement in the section covering flaws in the current world
trading system. Resistance from Washington was so great that the word ended up
being censored from the final text.
But this was also consistent with the Trump administration’s policies,
since if the international trade system has gone from being flawed to heading
for a complete breakdown, the shift can only be attributed to the US president,
who has levied tariffs on friends and rivals alike, sparking a major trade war
with China that has thrown the international economy into a tizzy and prompted
worldwide confusion and trade insecurity.
Protectionism is precisely what Trump is attempting to engage in (though
he refuses to call it that). But he has failed to realize that the global
economy is now so interconnected that it is impossible to impose protectionist
tariffs against another major world trading power like China, or such a close
trading partner as Canada, without shooting yourself in the proverbial foot.
The best example? The closure of five General Motors plants in the US because
tariffs imposed on imported parts have made it cheaper for the auto giant to
produce cars elsewhere.
Delegates from other countries attending the G20 meeting would later
reveal that negotiations had been grueling and that the US had been the lone
hold-out on nearly every issue included (and not included) in the final agreement.
The Trump administration has been openly critical of the World Trade Organization,
which is at odds with Trump’s America First (America Alone) policy that has his
administration implementing unprecedentedly aggressive trade policies targeting
not only China but also US allies in European Union and elsewhere.
Friday, November 30, 2018
HOSTAGES TO THE G20
Argentine President Mauricio Macri was very obviously elated at being
the master of ceremonies and center of attention at the start of the G20 summit
of major industrialized nations, which this year was being held in Argentina’s
capital city on November 30 and December 1. After a decade of isolationism and “bad company” under the populist
Kirchner regime that preceded his government, Macri has, in all fairness, bent
over backwards to lift Argentina out of its former pariah status on the Western
stage, and this G20 meeting is clearly a crowning moment for the country’s
president—though not so much for many of his people.
Trump fumbles with the earpiece then throws it to the floor. |
Macri made reference to the long relationship that his own
multi-millionaire family has had with billionaire Trump and his family for decades. Trump,
meanwhile, recalled how he had told the Argentine president’s father,
businessman Franco Macri, that he was sure Mauricio would one day be president
and congratulated himself for making the right call.
Macri said, “...It took us 30 years to convince you to come, Donald...We
had to wait for you to become president and for me to become president to
manage it, but we Argentines are really very happy to have you here in our
country.”
Clearly, there are many Argentines who would beg to differ.
As in many other parts of the world, Trump is a less than popular figure here among a very large segment of the population. He is often seen as a bully, when not as a buffoon, and as a danger in his role as the most powerful leader on earth, due to his America First (America alone) policy, his contempt for traditional US allies, his unpredictable and often belligerent foreign policies, his fostering of a worldwide trade war and his disregard for the basic tenets of democracy and for the science behind efforts to rein in global climate change. Add to that Argentina’s previous negative experiences with the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and foreign business and banking under the former military regime (1976-1983) and under the 10-year reign of elected President Carlos Saúl Menem (1989-1999), as well as the extraordinary and massively disruptive security efforts surrounding the G20 summit itself, and the mood among a major portion of the population is anything but positive surrounding either Trump’s visit or the summit as such.
Security for the two-day summit alone will cost Argentine taxpayers an approximate 43 million dollars at a time when adherence to IMF guidelines is imposing a cruel austerity program on the population at large. Since taking office, Macri has also scrapped former subsidies on basic services such as privatized electric power, natural gas, water and sewage, etc., causing utilities to skyrocket, while permitting concession-holders to pretty much dictate their own prices. A free-floating exchange rate and free-market price policy has significantly raised retail prices for basic necessities in dollar terms, while, additionally, new and increasingly onerous taxes have been imposed on a population already stretched thin, while pay increases and social security are being severely restrained by the Macri administration.
Clearly, there are many Argentines who would beg to differ.
As in many other parts of the world, Trump is a less than popular figure here among a very large segment of the population. He is often seen as a bully, when not as a buffoon, and as a danger in his role as the most powerful leader on earth, due to his America First (America alone) policy, his contempt for traditional US allies, his unpredictable and often belligerent foreign policies, his fostering of a worldwide trade war and his disregard for the basic tenets of democracy and for the science behind efforts to rein in global climate change. Add to that Argentina’s previous negative experiences with the IMF (International Monetary Fund) and foreign business and banking under the former military regime (1976-1983) and under the 10-year reign of elected President Carlos Saúl Menem (1989-1999), as well as the extraordinary and massively disruptive security efforts surrounding the G20 summit itself, and the mood among a major portion of the population is anything but positive surrounding either Trump’s visit or the summit as such.
Security for the two-day summit alone will cost Argentine taxpayers an approximate 43 million dollars at a time when adherence to IMF guidelines is imposing a cruel austerity program on the population at large. Since taking office, Macri has also scrapped former subsidies on basic services such as privatized electric power, natural gas, water and sewage, etc., causing utilities to skyrocket, while permitting concession-holders to pretty much dictate their own prices. A free-floating exchange rate and free-market price policy has significantly raised retail prices for basic necessities in dollar terms, while, additionally, new and increasingly onerous taxes have been imposed on a population already stretched thin, while pay increases and social security are being severely restrained by the Macri administration.
Ramped-up security for the summit has prompted a veritable shutdown of the entire
country. Mobility has been so severely restricted for the Friday and Saturday
summit that the government saw fit to declare an extraordinary national
holiday on Friday, and there has been a nationwide shutdown of domestic air services.
Long-distance bus services have also been suspended, as have subway and train
services for Buenos Aires and the Greater Buenos Aires area and maritime
services in the Port of Buenos Aires. Local bus services were being maintained
on a restricted basis. In short, Buenos Aires and indeed much of the country as a whole were being held hostage by the G20.
A vast number of Argentines tend to tremble whenever world leaders get together with their own government to decide their fate. This is not surprising, considering the country's checkered foreign policy and economic history. Many tend to figure that any time world leaders gather behind closed doors, the purpose will be to figure out how to divide up the world’s wealth, power and resources, and that, in the end, the common people will always lose. Judging from their own experience, the people of Argentina may very well have a point.
With regard to how certain local experts view Argentina’s hosting of the G20 summit, the opposition newspaper Página 12 asked Juan Gabriel Tokatlian, professor of international relations at Argentina’s Universidad Di Tella, to provide an opinion on what the benefit to Argentina would be of hosting the G20 here and of subordinating its foreign policy to the whims of Washington.
A vast number of Argentines tend to tremble whenever world leaders get together with their own government to decide their fate. This is not surprising, considering the country's checkered foreign policy and economic history. Many tend to figure that any time world leaders gather behind closed doors, the purpose will be to figure out how to divide up the world’s wealth, power and resources, and that, in the end, the common people will always lose. Judging from their own experience, the people of Argentina may very well have a point.
With regard to how certain local experts view Argentina’s hosting of the G20 summit, the opposition newspaper Página 12 asked Juan Gabriel Tokatlian, professor of international relations at Argentina’s Universidad Di Tella, to provide an opinion on what the benefit to Argentina would be of hosting the G20 here and of subordinating its foreign policy to the whims of Washington.
“The Government is
composed of an elite that believes that some of the Menem administration’s
recipes worked,”
Tokatlian told the daily. “But (Macri) doesn’t know the level of financialization that has taken
place in the world and that it’s not possible to go back to the '90s. That
world doesn’t exist anymore.”
According to the Universidad Di Tella professor, “They (the Macri
government) are not intellectually sophisticated. They have a logic of
interrelationship between the political world and the economic world more typical
of the '90s, which doesn’t exist today within the domestic internal dynamics of
the United States. So they opt for the third way, which is to believe that security
issues are going to be what will open other economic doors.
Then they look for the path to see how to get the Southern Command into to
the DEA, into the FBI. This shows ignorance.”
Tokatlian went on to say that, “in addition to their ignorance,
they have a very optimistic view of the world, of globalization, of the free
market, of the flow of investments, of the attraction posed by the arrival of a
government different from (the earlier) Argentina and of the end of what they call populism.
When optimism meets ignorance, the balance is a catastrophic cocktail.” The
fear, he said, was that Argentina would overreact. “Then,” he said, “we go from
ignorance and optimism to naivety and to voluntarism. That is a very bad
reading of the United States.”
Macri got a taste of this new, non-'90s realpolitik on the first day of the summit when Trump laid down a new rule. Basically, you're either with China or with the US. There's no in between.
Macri got a taste of this new, non-'90s realpolitik on the first day of the summit when Trump laid down a new rule. Basically, you're either with China or with the US. There's no in between.
Last Sunday, I arrived back in Argentina after almost a month away in my
native United States. I had nearly five hours to kill in the Jorge Newbery
metropolitan airport before catching my domestic flight to Patagonia. After
checking my bag, I decided to cross the street in front of the airport to walk
a while along the beautiful coast of the River Plate. But instead of the
usually lovely view I found blocks and blocks of what looked like a miniature
replica of Donald Trump’s ´proposed border wall—solid sheet metal nine feet
tall, topped by endless coils of razor wire. At first I couldn’t imagine why
this romantic and iconic Buenos Aires attraction had been so monstrously
violated. And then I realized that this was the ugly face of the upcoming G20
meeting.
Disheartened, I walked along the barrier dragging my carry-on behind me, unable to get even a glimpse of the miles-wide, lion-colored waters of the River Plate until, abruptly, passing the main security area of the airport, the wall ended and a familiar and welcome sight unfolded: the inveterate anglers who daily fish the waters of their city’s river from the sidewalk behind the flood wall. This was where they had all re-grouped, squeezed up the coastline by the aggressive new barrier, but undeterred from their beloved enterprise. There was the lady who sold bait, coffee, sandwiches and churros. There too was the food wagon that sold sausages, hamburgers, fries and drinks. And then the fishermen themselves, with their rods lined up along the flood wall, enjoying what had turned out to be a truly fine spring day. It was passive resistance, a reminder that the coastline was a long one and that the government wasn't going to be able to fence them out of all of it.
I found a place to sit and watch them for a while, and as I did, I had to
smile. The razor wire and security wall would always represent the unassailable
power of the rich over the common people. But the anglers represented the
simple truth that people adapt and find a way to work around the government, no
matter what gets thrown at them. Life goes on, governments and policies change.
The only thing that was constant, I realized, was this, people in the pursuit
of happiness...against all odds.
Tuesday, October 2, 2018
FALLING IN LOVE
As I was listening to excerpts from President Trump’s rally speech given
in Wheeling, West Virginia, in which he professed his love for Kim Jong-un, I
was trying to imagine if former President Barack Obama had said something
similar about a ruthless dictator.
I’m referring to Trump’s outrageous hyperbole regarding his “falling in
love” with the North Korean dictator. What Trump said, specifically, was, “We
are doing great. That was a big, big problem. I was really being tough and so
was he, and we would go back and forth. And
then we fell in love. No, really. He wrote me beautiful letters.”
You could feel everyone catch their breath for an instant before they
started to laugh. It was a joke...Wasn’t it?
That’s when I tried to imagine what the reaction would have been in West
Virginia (or Ohio, or Alabama, or Kentucky, or any number of other states that
encompass unshakable bastions of Trumpism) had President Obama said the same
thing about some anti-US dictator—any
anti-US dictator! Like, what if he’d said it about the ayatollahs of Iran,
jocularity notwithstanding, while his administration was negotiating the Iran
anti-nuclear accord? He would have been crucified. In Washington, the GOP (not
particularly known for its sense of humor) would have gone bat-shit crazy. They
might even have sought to impeach Obama for consorting with the enemy, even if
he’d said—like many are saying about Trump’s statement—that it was a clearly a joke.
Joke or not, Trump’s loving embrace of Kim has serious implications.
First, it can’t be taken as anything but a tacit endorsement of the North
Korean regime. It places Kim on a one-on-one footing with the president of the
United States, and thus weakens the US negotiating position, since while
Washington has done much to make overtures toward the North Korean dictator,
Kim has conceded little in return. There is no evidence that he has
substantially, if at all, reduced his country’s nuclear capabilities and thus,
the only real concession he has made has been to temporarily halt nuclear arms
and intercontinental ballistic missile testing.
Second, Trump’s full personal acceptance of Kim sends a signal to South
Korea that it should push ahead with its bilateral peace efforts with the Kim
regime. While lasting peace on the Korean Peninsula should surely be a principal
goal, it should only be consummated by means of bilateral concessions, not, as
appears to be the intention of South Korean leader Moon Jae-in, by easing
security and encouraging the US to do the same, without any mutual measures
being taken by Kim.
Third, and perhaps most importantly, Trump’s slobbering love affair with
Kim Jong-un sends a dangerous message to other despots worldwide. Kim is one of
the worst dictators on earth (despite Trump’s apparent affection for him) and
he has inherited his well-deserved reputation as such from two generations of
the brutal Kim dynasty that preceded him. Among other crimes, he has reportedly
ordered the murders of around 160 members of the government who didn’t agree
with him or whom he saw as potential traitors. He has also eliminated his
half-brother in a scandalous attack on foreign soil. But worse still, he has
continued the policy of his forebears of maintaining gulag-like work camps that
are reported to be worse than Nazi concentration camps. Some 130,000 citizens
populate these camps, many for such arbitrary “crimes” as “gossiping against
the State.”
A recent International Bar Association report charges that “there is
sufficient evidence to establish that perpetrators ranging from Kim Jong-un to
lower-level prison guards (have) perpetrated, and continue to perpetrate,
crimes against humanity in North Korean political prison camps.” The report
describes atrocities about which North Korean defectors have testified,
including, among many others, “a prisoner's newborn baby being fed to guard
dogs, the execution of starving prisoners caught digging for edible plants on
the mountainside, and a variety of violent measures designed to induce
abortions, including injecting motor oil into women's wombs.”
This is the monster with whom the US president has “fallen in love”. Nor
is it the first time that Trump has expressed admiration for what he considers the winning
virtues of ruthless dictators.
During his campaign for president he touted Russian strongman Vladimir
Putin as a better leader than US President Barack Obama and he has continued
his love affair with Putin up to the present day.
Duterte |
When he met Philippines dictator Rodrigo Duterte, he told the Filipino
leader that he “just wanted to congratulate” him because he had heard that
Duterte was doing an “unbelievable job on the drug problem.” It should be noted
that Duterte’s way of dealing with the drug problem was the extrajudicial
killings of drug dealers and addicts alike.
Trump said he was giving “very high marks” as well to Turkish autocrat
Recep Tayyip Erdogan. He said it at a time when Erdogan was cracking down on
the press, on his political opponents and on civil society as a whole, while
diminishing to an ever greater extent what had once been a democratic system in
Turkey.
Erdogan and Trump |
The US president has also praised Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi, saying el-Sisi was “doing
a fantastic job in a difficult situation” and lending him full US
support. Field Marshal Sisi seized power in a 2013 coup d’etat that toppled
Egypt’s first democratically-elected administration. His government has been criticized
worldwide for suppression of civil liberties and for human rights violations.
According to Human Rights Watch, el-Sisi has “maintained a zero-tolerance
policy towards dissent” and provided “near-absolute impunity for abuses by
security forces under the pretext of fighting terrorism.”
El-Sisi |
There was a time when the US, even under its most authority-prone
presidents, encouraged some form of democratic process in any country that
wanted to consider itself our ally. Those days, at least for now, are over.
Donald Trump praises despots shamelessly, probably because he himself has no
love for the democratic process or rule of law. Or at least if he does, he’s
keeping it a coveted state secret.
This kind of acceptance of truly evil despots undermines the image of
the United States abroad in two ways: First, it clearly separates us from other
Western nations that were our staunchest allies before the Trump regime came to
power, and that still strongly believe in the tenets of democracy and rule of
law. And second, it provides a signal to dictators and autocrats worldwide that
the US under Trump will give them a pass and maybe even legitimize them by
praising them to the heavens, as long as they can flatter their way—whether by
“love letters” or other means—into the current president’s good graces.
Sunday, September 30, 2018
SOBER AS A JUDGE: WHAT BRETT KAVANAUGH’S BEHAVIOR TELLS US ABOUT HIS FITNESS FOR THE SUPREME COURT
We Americans have all been “treated” to an unprecedented spectacle this
past week during the extended confirmation hearing for Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s
presidential nomination to the Supreme Court of the United States.
Ted Bundy |
I should start from the premise that, after years of getting to know
personally and reading about numerous victims of sexual abuse, I tend to be much
more sympathetic to victims than to their alleged victimizers. Abusers and
predators tend to be people who show one face in public and quite another in
private. Serial killer and serial rapist Ted Bundy, for instance, was
considered by many to be not only handsome, but also highly charismatic. And
these were traits that he exploited to win the trust of his victims—at least a
dozen of whom he decapitated, many both before and after sexually desecrating
their bodies.
Abusers are often regarded as model citizens. And their defense almost
always seeks to make the victim seem vindictive, confused, promiscuous, deranged
or all four. Predators seek to turn the tables and convert themselves into the
victims, saying they’ve been falsely accused and have no idea why their alleged
victims are trying to ruin their lives.
Bill Cosby |
The guilty verdict handed down in the case of “America’s Dad”, famed and
once beloved actor and comedian Bill Cosby, right at the height of the Kavanaugh
hearing, is a case in point. And for many it was a huge “holy crap” moment as they
realized that there was enough evidence to convict this iconic figure of
drugging and raping at least one victim (although another several dozen women—five
of whom testified during Cosby’s retrial—made similar claims that weren’t
admissible because the statute of limitations had passed). Andrea Constand, who
Cosby mentored and then groomed in 2004, before drugging and raping her, said
that she had come forward because she considered it her “civic duty” to end
Cosby’s reign as a serial rapist.
That said, before I knew any of the details of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford’s
accusation against Brett Kavanaugh of a sexual assault that allegedly occurred over
three decades ago, I’m embarrassed to say that my first assumption was that it
was a set-up. I immediately assumed that it was, pure and simple, part of a
concerted political strategy to keep Kavanaugh from being confirmed by the Senate
as a Supreme Court justice.
Since then, however, Dr. Ford has managed to change my mind. After
seeing what she has put herself through—death threats, having to move from her
home, having to go before an obviously hostile and utterly skeptical Senate committee
to testify on the intimate details of the alleged assault, and having to expose
to the general public both her family and a traumatic experience that she has
sought to repress from early adolescence to the present day—I can now only
assume that Dr. Ford felt, like Andrea Constand, that it was her civic duty to
denounce what happened to her all those years ago, before the alleged
perpetrator was appointed for life to a Supreme Court where his influence on
women’s rights and women’s issues will likely be major for a generation to come.
Dr. Christine Blasey Ford |
There were other reasons that convinced me of Dr. Ford’s sincerity: The
fact that she willingly submitted to (and passed) a polygraph test, and that
she not only said she would submit to, but demanded an FBI investigation into
her allegations ranked high among them.
It is important to recall that all we have up to now are the conflicting
testimonies of Dr. Ford and Judge Kavanaugh before the Senate Confirmation
Committee, which finally deigned to hear testimony from the two this past
week—though not from other women who have come forward with similar stories
that might well corroborate what Ford told them. It seems clear that the idea of
leading Republicans was to merely provide Dr. Ford with a soapbox from which to
make her accusation (tossing a bone to the #metoo movement in the process),
then to politely thank her for her visit and move on, post-haste, to the
confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh. But so
compelling was Ford’s testimony, and so underwhelming Kavanaugh’s performance, that
the committee finally had to heed the eleventh-hour change of heart by
swing-vote Republican Jeff Flake, who said he wanted an FBI probe before he
cast his vote.
Even though a week-long limit has been placed on that probe to see if
corroborating evidence can be turned up to back either Ford or Kavanaugh’s
stories, it is at least something more akin to due process than the sham that
would have had Christine Blasey Ford testifying one day and Brett Kavanaugh
being confirmed for the Supreme Court appointment the next. While, as I say, nothing
has yet been proven with regard to the testimony of either witness, Dr. Ford
did a lot better job of making her story believable than did Judge Kavanaugh—a
highly experienced jurist who came off to many looking like an hysterical
amateur with little idea of how to defend himself without coming completely unglued.
Judge Brett Kavanaugh |
In this regard, much has been made of the rage that Kavanaugh must
surely have been feeling because of how he was being “victimized” and his
reputation left in tatters as a result of Dr. Ford’s accusation. But it should
surely be taken into account that Ford is being victimized and accused every
bit as much as Kavanaugh is. She's being accused of being a liar and a
Democratic shill, for which, it might be added, there is absolutely no evidence.
The great difference, as I see it, is that she took a lie detector test and
called for the FBI to investigate (clearly nothing to hide), while Kavanaugh
(who, as a federal judge, should believe in due process, especially if he's
going to sit on the Supreme Court) has been dragged kicking and screaming to an
investigation, has refused to submit to a polygraph, and has shown a
comportment unbecoming of a Supreme Court justice in questioning before the
Senate committee.
During the questioning by Democratic senators, he was often hostile,
rude and uncooperative. And he voiced personal conspiracy theories, blaming
Democrats and “the Clintons” for what he called “a hit job” to keep him off the
Court. Many of his outrageously hostile and inappropriate statements during
testimony seemed to many reminiscent of the vitriolic tweeting style of
President Donald Trump, and hardly the cool, level-headed, professional
response that most of us would have expected from a federal judge, let alone a
candidate for the Supreme Court.
No matter what the practical outcome of the testimonies and subsequent
brief investigation might be, I feel that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford has done a
service to the nation by demonstrating a side of Brett Kavanaugh’s personality
that the rest of us surely never would have seen within the context of a majority
“good ol’ boys” confirmation process in which the judge would have been a
Republican shoo-in.
Instead, we have gotten to observe a Brett Kavanaugh who, when cornered,
immediately cracks and demonstrates his virulently anti-Democratic, violently
anti-liberal and inappropriately biased leanings—something that hardly speaks
well of his qualifications for the life-time appointment that he is seeking.
In the end, Judge Kavanaugh would surely have been well-advised to remain
“sober as a judge” during the questioning, and to have submitted to whatever
process was necessary to corroborate his innocence, instead of giving vent to
his uncontrolled rage, no matter how incensed he might have been at having his
place of privilege questioned by “a mere woman.”
Monday, August 27, 2018
JOHN McCAIN: CELEBRATING HIS LIFE AND LEGACY
Senator John McCain, who died last Saturday at the age of 81, was,
perhaps, the last of a breed among conservative US politicians. Certainly, in
the current GOP, usurped by interloper Donald Trump, he was one of a kind. And
any Republican politician who is resisting Trump’s divisive assault on the
party today is taking his or her cue from Senator McCain. Hopefully, the memory
of this unique statesman will serve to encourage other conservatives to resist
and to reach across the aisle, as John McCain did throughout his storied political
career, to embrace his opponents and seek common ground instead of focusing on
their differences.
Grandson and son of high-ranking naval officers, John McCain began his
service to his country in the mid-1950s, when he enrolled in the Naval Academy
at Annapolis. He had been a skilled amateur wrestler in high school, and at
Annapolis he took up boxing and became a respectable lightweight. Even then, he
was a maverick with a high IQ, who excelled in courses he liked (such as
literature and history) but paid scant attention to those he didn’t. As such,
he often found himself in trouble with his superiors, but he was looked up to
by many of his classmates, and he found even greater favor by using his
considerable fighting skills to stand up for underdogs who often became the
victims of bullying at the academy.
He received his commission as an ensign in 1958, after which he enrolled
for two years of training at the Pensacola Air Station in order to become a
Navy pilot. His training completed in 1960, McCain was commissioned as a ground-attack
bomber pilot. In his earliest missions, he gained a dubious reputation as an
often reckless air jockey, who pushed safety to the limit and beyond. As such,
he ended up crashing three different military aircraft with sufficient skill to
avoid serious injury.
By 1967, aged 30, McCain had risen to the rank of lieutenant commander
and requested combat duty. He was assigned to fly A-4 Skyhawks off of the
flight deck of the ill-fated aircraft carrier USS Forrestal. He and his fellow
pilots on the aircraft carrier were to form part of Operation Rolling Thunder,
a series of bombing runs initiated out of the Gulf of Tonkin against North Vietnamese
targets.
McCain was aboard the Forrestal when an infamous fire broke out aboard
the carrier, in which 134 seamen perished before the flames could be brought
under control. McCain himself had to escape from his aircraft after it caught
fire in the advancing flames. It was while he was attempting to help other
pilots trapped in the blaze that Lieutenant Commander McCain was seriously
wounded by shrapnel from a bomb set off by the fire.
With the Forrestal taken out of commission, and once cured sufficiently of
his wounds, McCain volunteered to continue to play a part in Rolling Thunder
from aboard the aircraft carrier USS Oriskany. All of this happened in that
same year 1967, in which Lieutenant Commander McCain would fly 22 successful
bombing missions and would be awarded the Navy Commendation Medal and a Bronze
Star.
It was on his 23rd mission, in October 1967, that John McCain
was shot down over Hanoi. He broke both arms and a leg when he ejected from his
heavily damaged Skyhawk. He nearly drowned when he parachuted into a lake, but
was picked up by a North Vietnamese patrol. The Viet Cong regulars used their
rifle butts to break both of McCain’s shoulders and then one of them bayoneted
him.
After his capture, he was placed in an infamous prison known to GIs as “the
Hanoi Hilton”. There, he was refused medical attention and was beaten and
tortured repeatedly in an attempt to get information from him. His two
cellmates at the time didn’t expect him to live. But against all odds, he did.
He was only given medical attention after his captors found out that he was an
admiral’s son. Word of his being shot down spread quickly in the international
press.
In early 1968, McCain was placed in solitary confinement, where he would
remain for nearly two years. At one point during that time, after his father
became commander of US forces in the Vietnam Theater, the Viet Cong offered to
release McCain into US Navy custody. This was a propaganda ploy that, on the
one hand was designed to demonstrate how merciful the Viet Cong military was
toward its enemies, and, on the other, to show other US POWs that the
privileged sons of high ranking American officers were willing to use their
influence to gain early release.
However, in strict adherence to US articles of war, which prohibit
American service personnel from accepting special parole or privilege from the
enemy, Lieutenant Commander John McCain refused to accept release unless all
other POWs were released with him. As a result, he was subjected to unspeakable
new horrors, in which he was taken from his cell and beaten regularly every two
hours for an indefinite period of time. During this period he lost 50 pounds
and as his health began to fail, he contemplated suicide. His attempt to kill
himself was foiled, however, by prison guards and the torture continued.
Eventually, McCain realized that he had reached his breaking point—every
person has one, and certainly his was far and away a very high bar. He signed
an anti-US propaganda statement. Surely, no one (with the exception of Donald
Trump) has ever blamed McCain for finally folding when life had become
unbearable and suicide impossible. No one, that is, except John McCain himself,
who always considered the signing of that false “confession” a “dishonorable
act”. To make up for it, McCain refused to sign any further propaganda papers
and as such, was again subjected to regular beatings several times a week.
It wasn’t until 1973, after more than five years in captivity, and in
the waning days of US participation in the Vietnam War, that John McCain was released.
The injuries that he suffered in captivity would plague him for the rest of his
life. Among other things, he was never again able to raise his arms above his
head. Despite that fact, after going through long and harrowing physical rehabilitation,
he was eventually reinstated as a Navy aviator and was given command of a
flight training group in Florida.
Having achieved the rank of captain, John McCain decided to retire from
the Navy in 1981. He was granted a disability pension. Over the course of his
distinguished military career, McCain received a Silver Star, two Legion of
Merits, three Bronze Stars, two Distinguished Flying Crosses, two Purple
Hearts, two Navy and Marine Corps Commendation Medals, and a POW Medal.
But John McCain was best known
for his political career. As a congressman and senator for the state of
Arizona, McCain spent 36 years in the US Congress. His colleagues, almost to a
man and woman, and on both sides of the aisle, recognize that, whether you
agree politically with John McCain or not, everything that he has done
throughout his political career has been, to the best of his knowledge, what he
thought was “the right thing to do.” He has been a hard-core opponent of those
who disagree with him, but he has also been quick to admit to mistakes and
errors of judgment.
He has also been a consummate statesman, who has sought results over
party line. From Ted Kennedy to Barack Obama, and from Hillary Clinton to Chuck
Schumer, he is remembered as a tough opponent but one who, when it came time to
seek results, was willing to sit down and negotiate from a position of common
ground rather than stonewalling on points of contention. This willingness to
see the other point of view even while sticking to his convictions is clearly
what permitted a staunch Republican like McCain to forge a deep and lasting
friendship with a committed Democrat such as Joe Biden.
John McCain was, perhaps, the last of the Eisenhower-type Republicans.
He believed in country above party, decency above advantage, fairness above winning,
despite his combative nature and his adherence to his own strict code of
ethics.
His bitter opposition to Donald Trump has been that of a true
representative of “the party of Lincoln”. Trump is everything that John McCain
opposed, as the president has demonstrated in the shabby treatment that he has
given to Senator McCain himself. Trump once complained that he had raised a
million dollars for McCain’s presidential bid and that McCain had “let us down.”
Adding, “I never liked him as much after that because I don’t like losing.”
Asked how he could show such disrespect for a proven war hero after calling
McCain “a dummy” and “a loser”, five-time draft dodger Donald Trump said, “He's
not a war hero. He's a war hero because he was captured. I like people that
weren't captured.”
The statement shocked the majority of Americans, but rolled off the
backs of Trump’s blindly loyal base like water off a duck’s back. Many,
including myself, thought such an attack on an American military and political
icon would end the career of a recently born-again Republican interloper in
McCain’s own party, but we were all wrong about that. A significant segment of
the population that was no longer interested in the values that McCain so
clearly embodied—honesty, truth, justice, democracy, duty, honor and
country—would carry Trump to a narrow victory in which he lost the popular vote
by three million votes, and the GOP would suffer a humiliating setback in its
erstwhile incarnation as the party of Lincoln, the party of Eisenhower and the
party of John McCain.
Trump cannot find it in his heart to be generous toward John McCain even
in death. A terse tweet sending condolences to McCain’s family was clearly
going to be the president’s only concession to a man whose selfless service to
his country spanned six decades. This despite the reported urging of Chief of Staff
Kelly and other White House insiders that Trump release a eulogy statement
written for him. Instead, the president jetted off to play golf. And on his
return, he ordered the White House flag, which flew at half-mast over the
weekend, to be returned to full mast.
This so angered veterans and congressional insiders that Trump was
reluctantly forced to release a statement, two days following the senior senator’s
death, grudgingly claiming that, “Despite our differences on policy and
politics, I respect Senator John McCain’s service to our country and, in his
honor, have signed a proclamation to fly the flag of the United States at half-staff
until the day of his interment.”
Too little too late, the president’s attitude speaks volumes of how
different from John McCain’s his brand of “Republicanism” is—politics without
honor, without truth, without chivalry, without concession, without sacrifice,
and without patriotism.
Tuesday, August 21, 2018
Saturday, August 11, 2018
BRUSH...
I’d like to explain my absence.
Where to begin?
A couple of weeks back I had what, at the time, I considered “a little
accident”. I was doing some work outside the house here in Patagonia—scraping
the snow off of Virginia’s car, checking to make sure the entry valve to our
water storage tanks wasn’t frozen, unsticking the padlock on the front gate so Virginia
could get out, etc.
I was doing all of this in my indoor shoes, something I seldom do in
freezing weather, but I was in a rush and not putting on my boots, I thought,
would save some time.
It was as I was again climbing to the top of our flagstone steps to open
the gate for Virginia that I stepped on a patch of ice and felt myself starting
to slip. Now, I’m usually sure-footed and immediately sought to recover, but
failed to be able to get off of the ice or to stop the slide.
Unfortunately, I was at the top of a six-foot drop into our patio and
simply, like a man washed overboard, slipped off the edge back first. The first
thing to break my fall was a large granite boulder. Obviously, my body did the
giving. I tried to scramble to my feet so as not to scare Virginia who was
running back to see what had happened, but I was feet upgrade, head down, and
scrambling never came into it.
I struggled to turn over, got on my knees and managed to push myself to
my feet with the help of the roof of a sturdy doghouse. The pain was
excruciating. I knew it was bad. Nothing had ever hurt like this before. But I
managed to convince Virginia to go ahead about her errands. I just needed to
catch my breath, I told her.
Inside the house, I did a quick damage control. The pain was persistent
but I was getting my breath back. I could walk with certain difficulty but none
of my limbs was broken. I was sure it was just a bad fall and that by the next
day I’d be feeling better.
The next day, however, I realized that certain ways I moved a rib was
clicking and decided to get myself looked at. At the local clinic they took
x-rays and confirmed that I had a broken rib. There wasn’t much I could do about
it, they said—wear a wrap eight hours a day and take painkillers. No going out
for at least five days and no physical exertion for at least two weeks.
The third day, a Saturday, I did as I was told, but I started feeling
worse all the time. I had to wear the wrap only a couple of hours at a time
rather than eight straight because I was having difficulty breathing. In the
evening when I took off the wrap, I immediately felt dizzy and confused. I had
tunnel-vision and felt that I might black out. I told Virginia that I wanted to
lie down on the couch and that if I didn’t get to feeling better soon, I’d let
her drive me to the clinic to get checked out.
That never happened. Once I was down on the couch, I was never able to
get up again under my own power. Virginia called the paramedics and in a short
time, two consummate professionals, a man and a woman, managed to sit me up and
started asking questions. I kept trying to doze off but they kept talking to me,
loudly, assertively.
“Come on, champ! Hang in there. You’re going to be all right.” They
asked about medication, ailments, etc., and I muttered answers as coherently as
I could. But by now, all I wanted to do was sleep, and they apparently had to
avoid that at all costs.
They’d had to leave their vehicle fifty meters above the house, partly
over rough terrain. They wanted to see if they could get me there on foot. They
managed to drag me to my feet, but as soon as they did, everything went black.
Next thing I knew the male paramedic was yelling my name in my face. I think I
tried to say something like, “Just let me sleep a while and I’ll be okay.” But
I don’t know if I actually said it.
Finally, with the help of Virginia, they were manhandling me into a
strange sort of wheel chair and strapping me in. How they did it I’ll never
know since the woman couldn’t have weighed more than 120 pounds, but between
the two of them, they managed to maneuver my 235 pounds up the path one step at
a time, across the gravel and into the ambulance.
Once inside they locked my chair to the wall so as not to have to get me
onto a stretcher. They told Virginia to follow us in her car. It was already
well after midnight by this time. We had a mile of rocky pitted mountain road
to negotiate before we reached the highway. They were constantly asking how I
was doing, if I was with them. I could hear them like from very far away
talking among themselves. The woman was driving. At one point he was consulting
her about my condition, reading her my vital signs, such as they were, and she
stopped the ambulance and climbed into the back with us.
She was busying herself over me, perhaps giving me an injection, when I
heard him say, “You’re lucky you got her, champ, she’s a genius.”
And then we were under way again. I felt the jostling stop as we pulled
onto the blacktop of the highway. As we drove, the guy stayed close, talking to
me, squeezing my hand, saying, “Stick with me, champ! Come on, it won’t be long
now. You’re doing great!” But then I heard him say to the woman, “Hit the
lights and step on it. I can’t find his pulse anymore.”
At the clinic they were waiting for us. Between sleep and
semi-consciousness, I felt myself being borne dizzyingly fast on a stretcher
through the narrow halls, the front end being used as a battering ram to open successive
swinging doors. There were drips hanging above me and they were taking blood
pressure, temperature, pulse. Somebody cut my shirt off with surgical scissors.
Then I felt them slide me into the tunnel of a tomography unit. I wanted to
warn them that I was claustrophobic, but suddenly I was asleep again.
The next thing I knew, a doctor was shouting in my face, “Danny! Danny!
Can you hear me?”
I nodded.
“You punctured a lung, buddy.” I wanted to mention that I was taking
blood thinners, but clearly, he was already aware of that. Instead, I grimaced
and nodded. “The surgeon’s here. We’re going to get a tube into your lung to
draw off the blood.”
Later, in recovery, I heard the surgeon say, “We’ve drawn off about four
and a quarter pints of blood. We’re leaving you hooked up because you’re still
bleeding and we’re taking you to the ICU.”
I would later find out I’d lost another couple of pints to an intramuscular
bleed that had bloomed across my back and side.
When I awoke in the ICU the next morning, I knew where I was. I was
fairly comfortable. I’d gotten an end bed with a window where I could watch the
sunrise on the mountains and the lake. As I lay there watching the beautiful
red light tinge the snow-choked mountain tops, the phrase “brush with death”
came to mind. And I suddenly, to my surprise, teared up and felt a wellspring
of emotion thinking, “This is what it means. I might never have seen this
again.”
Then I thought, “It’s a new day, the only one I have, and nothing will
ever be the same again.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)